bonar crump

bonar crump
husband - father - reader - runner - picker - grinner - lover - sinner

Thursday, November 3, 2016

Empathy and Anxiety

My anxiety levels are through the roof. I’m experiencing empathy overload. Life isn’t always as straight-forward as we’d like it to be for those of us carrying heavy burdens for people dealing with adversity, hardship, or injustice. Empathic tolerance is a thing. It’s a thing that allows open-hearted folks to endure the chaos they rub up against. Empathic tolerance requires healthy levels of empathic resistance in order to avoid overload and subsequent empathic collapse.

Tears help. There’s something about tears that are restorative. Crying is a “giving over” to the overload and allowing excess hurt, anger, grief, and despair to spill out.

I was recently interviewed about discipleship relevant to membership in a Motorcycle Club community. I told a story about a guy falling in a hole. The guy falls into a deep hole and can’t climb out. A doctor comes by and our guy asks for help. The doctor writes a prescription on a piece of paper and throws it into the hole as he moves on. A priest comes by later and writes a prayer on a piece of paper which he throws down into the hole and moves on. Still later, a friend wanders by. Our guy hollers up to him. “Joe, I’m down in this hole. Can you get me out?” Joe jumps down into the hole with him. Our guy states with amazement, “are you stupid? Now we’re both stuck down here!” Joe confidently answers, “I’ve been down here before and I know the way out.” As soon as I uttered these last words, I developed a knot in my throat the size of a bowling ball, dropped my eyes to my boots, and began to fight back tears.

I wasn’t embarrassed by this show of emotion. As a matter of fact, I was a little disappointed that the editors of the interview cut it out. Although, I fully understand why they did.

Getting choked up wasn’t all about sorrow. Some of it was about gratefulness. Some of it was about feeling helpless. Some of it was about sensing my own undeservingness. Much of it was about my lack of empathetic resistance.



Every time I engage another charitable effort I’m exposed to new levels of need. At what point does one succumb to the urge to “Van Gogh” by chopping off one’s own ear? If not the ear, then what? Maybe abusing alcohol is the severed ear. Maybe it’s marital strife. What if the ear loss manifests itself as combative behavior to those who dismiss our empathic priorities. I’m sure that we all “Van Gogh” to the beat of a million different drummers.

I have the sense that unchecked levels of empathic overload resulting in a backup of emotional stress often trigger the pressure release valves of destructive behavior. Most of us will seek emotional, physical, or intellectual sedation rather than engage an excessive emotional buildup of stress. We’ll do anything within our power to hold off the full experience of an undesirable emotional event.

I believe that the vast majority of “bad people” are those caught up in cycles of life resembling a deep hole with steep walls. They are deep in the hole and may have stopped asking folks up top for help. They’ve been in the hole so long that they’re either unaware of anything other than the hole or they’ve lost hope in every getting out.

We have to jump down into the hole. Oftentimes, we have to put ourselves in jeopardy in order to be benefactors. Our empathy should compel us to engage, embrace, and partner with folks living down deep. Compassion is our voice of empathy declaring that “bad” people are mostly misunderstood. The disadvantaged aren’t “bad.” The unhealthy aren’t “bad.” The misguided aren’t “bad.” The uneducated aren’t “bad.” There is no THEM. There is only US.

There is US in the hole. There is US not in the hole. That’s it.



My spontaneous loss of emotional control during the interview was both a remembrance and a foreshadowing. I was remembering all those that have jumped in the hole and led me out. I was thinking about all of those that I needed to help out of their holes. I was experiencing an overwhelming sense of humility. And within that same nanosecond, I recognized the faces of loved ones that I could only offer notes of encouragement thrown down into their hole.

And then it was gone. The moment that forced me to stare straight down lifted. It was like it had a four breath max and then passed through me. I looked up to see the cameraman fighting back tears. Likewise, the interviewer was struggling to maintain composure. It wasn’t just me. It wasn’t even about me or my empathy overload. Something had released in all of us.

After unhooking my mic and taking down the tripod, we all awkwardly laughed and shook it off. I didn’t know what holes they were dealing with. They didn’t know the depth of my past or present holes. What we knew collectively was that honest vulnerability (whether intentional or spontaneous) triggers something undeniably transformative.

I recognize that creating connections safe enough to share vulnerability gets us part of the way out of our holes. I’m thinking that there’s hope in the safety followed by a trust in the vulnerability which set the stage for transformative moments. This has to be the way out. This has to be how we cry out to someone up top for help.

OR—we can barricade ourselves behind a wall of indifference. We can convince ourselves that isolation and aversion will keep us safe. We can think of vulnerability as weakness and empathy as subjugation. We can drive a flag deep into the soil and claim whatever hole we’re in as sovereign domain. The problem with this approach is that it’s not transformative. It offers no movement past or through the struggles we experience.

If I declare my location as fixed then it’s imperative that I’m RIGHT. And if I’m RIGHT then alternative locations are WRONG. Now I’ve got an US, a THEM, an immutable creed, and I no longer have to wrestle with challenges to my beliefs. A fixed position requires defense. Defense begs for walls. Walls prevent access. Walls provide a false sense of security. Walls abhor cooperation.

No. I will endure the insufferable anxiety and discomfort of empathy. I’ll embrace the uncertainty of emotional movement and transformation. I’ll embrace motion and discussion and compassion and cooperation. For the sake of nothing more than understanding, I’ll risk being wrong more than I’ll strive to be right. Enlightenment demands a posture of acceptance instead of resistance.

My anxiety levels are through the roof. But this, too, shall pass. On the other side is learning, understanding, and a grateful path of escape for us all. Because whatever we Iearn during this season we’ll pass on to others we come across. As best as we’re able, we’ll help. We’ll offer to partner and grasp at transformative life void of walls or defensive postures. If it takes some tears, so be it. It will certainly involve struggle and breathing through the moments that overwhelm.


AND—it’ll be far better than the alternative.

Tuesday, November 1, 2016

Some of What We Do

October 2-10, 2016
Book Tour (2,500 miles)
Fundraising Ride
$78K+ Raised for Boot Campaign


Monday, September 19, 2016

Sign the Petition

HOW THIS WILL HELP

This Profiling witness/victim statement will prove to the State Legislature that profiling is a pervasive problem in Texas that requires legislative relief.

** PETITION **

Texas Legislature

I have been the victim of, and/or have witnessed, the law enforcement practice of motorcycle profiling and discrimination in the state of Texas within the last five years.
Defined by statute, the unlawful practice of profiling occurs when law enforcement targets an individual displaying characteristics of a class that the officer believes more likely than others to commit a crime or be violent.
In terms of motorcycling, motorcycle profiling occurs when law enforcement targets an individual riding a motorcycle or wearing motorcycle related paraphernalia because that officer believes that motorcyclists are more likely than others to be guilty of a crime or be violent.
I believe that the practice of motorcycle profiling is an unlawful violation of the 1st Amendments guarantees of free expression and assembly, the 14th Amendment's equal protection guarantees, and the Texas Constitution.
Signed,
Bonar Crump

For Immediate Release 09/16/2016

We have a willing sponsor for anti-motorcycle profiling legislation named Sen. Kirk Watson. Our primary effort right now is to collect the data necessary to forward legislation to the TX Senate during the first 60 days of the 2017 legislative session. The site and petition linked in this email is a reproduction of the same petition put forth in MD resulting in successful passage of legislation signed by their Governor on May 19, 2016. But first things first...this is TX and we need to understand the timelines we're dealing with.  
“To introduce a bill in the senate, a senator first must file the required number of copies of the bill with the secretary of the senate, who sequentially numbers each bill in the order in which it is received. The senate rules of procedure also permit unrestricted introduction of bills during the first 60 calendar days of each regular session. After the 60-day deadline, the introduction of any bill in the senate, other than a local bill, emergency appropriations, or emergency matters specifically submitted by the governor, requires the consent of at least four-fifths of the membership of the senate.”   
There's your sense of urgency. We need this bill introduced to the Senate before the end of February 2017. That means the data and supportive documentation necessary to pull this off has to be completed by end of October. Legislative session begins January 10,2017. If we miss this window of opportunity, we have to wait until opening of legislative session in 2019.
Respectfully,   
Bonar Crump
President - Grim Guardian MC
[McLennan Co. Inmate #171015 - Cell #J-136  > Incarcerated: 05/18/2015 - 06/01/2015]

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Singularity


As we analyze the projections of exponential growth pertaining to technology, we arrive at an idea some have referred to as the Singularity. The Singularity is actually a concept coming out of physics which can describe the point at the center of a black hole where all time, matter, and energy converge into one singular point and the very fabric of physics is torn into pieces. The concept of a wormhole is that at this point of singularity the physical state of the universe begins to fold in on itself creating a vacuum sucking everything from one point and expelling it out another. This would be like the connecting point of a circle. It is the starting point and ending point at the same time. It would be a loop of never ending time, matter, and energy. Ergo, the Singularity would be the point where we witness the beginning, end, and everything in between. Philosophically, the Singularity is the culmination of all that was and all that will be into one central location, time, and space. Singularity, in the philosophical sense, is the final realization of all known Truth.

Our religion is a philosophy. It is a set of beliefs guiding our worldview, influencing our behaviors, and regulating our understanding of the after-life. Those that consider themselves “very religious” pay close attention to the philosophical tenets of their shared organized religious beliefs. Others who consider themselves “unreligious” tend to pay closer attention to their existential intellectual observations when building a life philosophy. One group might be considered more stable and rooted in the philosophies which have been proven out over the test of time. The other group might be considered more nimble and sensitive to the evolving culture and world in which they presently live. The overall positive or negative evaluation of either group is wholly dependent upon the perspective one has at the moment of analysis. The ultimate conflict between the two groups is that the “very religious” see reality through the lens of their established philosophy while the “unreligious” develop their philosophy based on the lens of their own life experience. One believes that the entire grocery store of existence fits into their philosophical grocery cart. The other carefully chooses items off of the grocery shelves of existence in order to fill their philosophical grocery cart as best they can.

The Singularity, as discussed by Ray Kurzweil, is a point where informational and technological growth have increased exponentially along a long enough timeline that human ability to contain it, or even continue to fathom its full implications, fails entirely necessitating an evolutionary watershed moment where biological humans begin to mesh with technology and become cyborgs. The idea is that assimilation with such a rapidly advancing technology would be preferable to being left behind and eventually eliminated by a race of cybernetic intelligence that might look upon a purely biological human as we do an ant or a mosquito. Kurzweil’s Singularity is the coming together of humanity and technology in a way that blurs the lines between the two entirely resulting in a new form of existence which supersedes its predecessors.

Most religions (philosophies) share similar ideas of a spiritual Singularity. Whether discussing an after-life or contemplating an end-times scenario, various ideas of being reunited with one’s God, Creator, or Energy Source seem to look like a spiritual wormhole where one has looped back at the very end to the source of the very beginning. Singularity with one’s God, whether that God be energy or a being or a cosmic consciousness, seems to be an overwhelmingly accepted philosophy professed by every major religion, science, and belief system throughout all of human existence. For the most part we can all agree that we return to the original base form from which we have come indiscriminate of what our primary life experience has been. “Ashes to ashes…dust to dust.”

As one’s philosophical views become more forward-looking and organic, it becomes easier to navigate meaning in the contemporary world that we live in. With the exponential growth of world population, energy consumption, need for natural resources, and technology it seems highly unlikely that the philosophical worldviews established over the last 5,000 years could account for ALL that is happening now and about to happen in the next 50 years. For instance, technologically, the world of 2000 BC was much more similar to the world of 1500 AD than 1900 AD is to today. That means that the previous 4000 years of human existence are incredibly similar when using the last 150 years as a template of comparison. And it is certain that what is technologically possible 50 years from now is nowhere close to proving realistically viable today. This is the result of exponential growth in knowledge which spurns exponential growth in technology which spurns exponential growth in pursuit of Truth (or philosophy of existence).

In this sense, philosophical Singularity is the compressing together of these elements (knowledge, technology, and truth) into one singular place at one singular time when the very fabric of existence is torn and the beginning intersects with the end creating a loop, or wormhole, where all reality, perspective, and philosophy come together fully unified and fully revealed. For most, this spiritual Singularity is called “afterlife” or “judgment day”. It is where all misconceptions are left behind and truth is revealed without distraction of alternative theories. It is where truth becomes self-evident and reality is no longer dependent upon perspective. In a sense, this spiritual Singularity is the focal point of our most predominant religious philosophies from the ancient Egyptians to the American Indians to the contemporary Christians. Achieving spiritual Singularity with one’s deity drives the daily behaviors, politics, economics, and overall worldview of the majority of past and contemporary human society.